Physics

Top: Science: Physics:

» Eric Weisstein's Treasure Trove of Physics - Online encyclopedia of physics terms and formulas. Full searchable, and also browsable alphabetically and by topic. Part of Eric's Treasure Troves of Science.




» The Net Advance of Physics - MIT resource providing discussions at various levels of sophistication that cover all areas of physics.




» Physics 2000 - Provides an interactive opportunity to learn visually and conceptually about 20th Century science and high-tech devices.




» Physics and Astronomy Classification Scheme (PACS) - Hierarchical numbering scheme, developed by the American Institute of Physics, used to identify fields and sub-fields of physics.




» Physics Central - A page on modern physics, such as quantum mechanics and black holes, and some mathematics.




» Physics News Graphics - Diagrams (with captions) appearing in various AIP publications, sorted by category or by date.




» Physics on MathPages - Articles, leaning towards a mathematical description, on a wide range of topics in physics.




» Physics Post - A tutorial and article driven community. Votes, science news and a discussion forum.




» Physics Today - The flagship publication of the American Institute of Physics (AIP). Provides feature articles, news stories, analyses, book and product reviews, a searchable job database, and obituaries.




» Physics.org - Searchable database of physics resources from the Institute of Physics which matches a person's question, age and knowledge profile to handpicked sites. Also includes the Physics Life animation.




» PhysLINK - Links to physics departments, physical societies, journals, job information, and other physics related information.




» Physnet: The Physics Departments and Documents Network - Serves information from physics departments and institutes worldwide: departmental information, locally stored documents, authoring tools, free access journals, jobs, conferences and education material.




» TheTangentBundle Physics Project - An experimental wiki-based collection of user-contributed articles on graduate level physics topics including subjects such as string theory, quantum field theory, mathematical physics and quantum mechanics.




» What You Want To Know About Physics - Summarizes in simple language, without advanced mathematics, the foundations of physics. The index gives direct access to selected topics.




» World Year of Physics 2005 - International effort to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the Miraculous Year (1905) and raise public awareness of physics.




» Scientific American - Questions That Plague Physics - A conversation with Lawrence M. Krauss, chair of the physics department at Case Western Reserve University. [PDF] (August, 2004)

» Physics Today - News, feature articles, reviews, obituaries, and other items from the monthly magazine for the physics community. [RSS]

• Re: Don't talk to Aliens Or God! Okay, for starters, being another universe, you wouldn't be able to
  see it here. That's sort of the point.
  Second, your entire argument is premised on the belief that just
  because I can't see God, that doesn't mean he doesn't exist.
  Pick and choose your position much?
• Re: Speed of light relative to what? Yep, and Doppler proves it.
  Glad to see you recognise how relativity is total bullshit, dumbfuck.
• Re: Question About Gravitational Attraction F = G mM/r^2, so it depends on the mass and the distance
  between them.
  For two small masses, a feather and a hammer fall at the same
  rate toward the big Moon as was proven.
  [link]
  So a hammer has a greater force applied to it than the feather, but
  it also has the greater inertia and so the acceleration is the same.
• Re: Bringing attractive particles together Your answer to my question (2 postings up):
  ------------------------------ --------------------------
  Yes? You still owe the proof for Dark Matter. This proof
  should include a minimum explanation what Dark Matter is
  in terms of elemantary particles as described in:
  [link]
• Re: Speed of light relative to what? Glad to see you recognise how relativity applies to photons. In classical
  physics there IS c+v and c-v.
  No .. you won't, and yes, it does.
• Quantum Gravity 408.9: Scaling Laws and Dimensionless Ratios and Multiple Scales are a Key Lesson of Quantum Gravity via Probable Causation/Influence (PI) From Osher Doctorow
  Whenever we explore a new field in science or mathematics, we tend to
  use something like Dimensional Analysis or Dimensionless Ratios, and
  then as we progress we tend to try to "advance" to Algebra, Algebraic
  Topology, Algebraic Geometry, Calculus of Variations, Combinatorics,
  Number Theory, Tensor Calculus, and their associated Physics. In this
• Re: Speed of light relative to what? On Sep 10, 10:05 am, harald > > >[1895], which is based on the
  assumption of an ether that is
  ---------------------
  While dealing with photons
  there is no c+v no c-v
  those are only for big masses
  not for photons!!
  photons move at c
  as far as we know now -only photons !!
  )it might be even other physical entities
• EINSTEINIANA WITHOUT BIG BANG Einsteiniana is getting rid of Big Bang, accelerating expansion of the
  universe and related idiocies (slowly, painfully, with a lot of
  camouflage):
  [link]
  Dave Goldberg, Associate Professor of Physics at Drexel University:
  "The idea of dark energy is so ridiculous that almost every question
• THE GRUSENICK EFFECT. predicted
  accounting
  nearly
  Selling
  all
  Wavelength of laser = ~700 nanometers.
  Distance from beam splitter to mirror = ~ 7 cm
  Number of cycles between beam splitter and mirror =1,000,000
  when apparatus is mounted horizontally (no gravity).
  3 wavelength shifts when beam going up = 1,000,003 cycles.
  Wavelength is shortened by gravity, need more to reach mirror.
• Question About Gravitational Attraction I saw a popular science tv program stating that if two dice
  were (somehow) put into space relatively(?) close and
  stationary to one another then gravity would cause the two
  to move towards each other.
  My question is: would the rate at which the two dice move
  together be the same or different if instead of dice the
• Re: The Impossible Concept of Mutual Time Dilation
• Re: Mutual "length contraction" in Euclidean geometry "The train does not shrink." -- Inert moron.
• Re: Mutual "length contraction" in Euclidean geometry the
  then
  rod"
  I quote Einstein and that means I don't know. Got it.
  Thanks for showing everyone what a clueless moron you are.
• Re: The Impossible Concept of Mutual Time Dilation You're still wrong .. and I note that you failed to show otherwise.
  Nope
  [snip even more unnecessary evidence that Androcles is a moron who has no
  idea what SR says]
• Re: Mutual "length contraction" in Euclidean geometry I've always had it right .. still waiting for you to catch up
  Wrong
  I've already learnt .. still waiting for you to catch up

nowosci